Sunday, June 26, 2011

Mozilla FireFox 5 vs Google Chrome 12


I have been using Mozilla Firefox 5 since Mozilla developer announced it, firstly when I decide to add this post I was not going to compare between Mozilla Firefox 5 and Google Chrome 12, just to check Firefox 5 enhancements. But when I used couple benchmarks for checking HTML 5, JavaScript, and CSS 3, didn’t expect this result.


Browsers Versions
Mozilla Firefox 5.0 – Google Chrome 12.0.742.100
In both web browsers we used same benchmark tools for checking web browser performance, memory usage, CPU usage, JavaScript, CSS 3, and HTML 5.

1. PeaceKeeper Benchmark

Peacekeeper is a JavaScript performance and animations, navigations functionality benchmark tool. check mostly common used JavaScript functions in web browsers.
 
After few minutes for peacekeeper benchmarking performs rendering, social network, complex graphics, data processing, DOM operation, and text parsing test.

2. Asteroidsbench for kevs3d

HTML 5 Benchmark teets 2D canvas rendering performance with FPS for commonly used HTML 5 functions in games drawimage, drawimage scaling, alpha, composition, shadows, and text functions.
check the benchmark on the screencast for Firefox with chrome side by side.

3. V8 Benchmark Suite

Another JavaScript benchmark higher score means better performance Here.
 

4. PaintBall Benchmark Tool

Even after using Microsoft PaintBall benchmark tool Firefox 5 able to paint the whole paint in 41.70 seconds, and painted 125 Paintballs per minutes. Google Chrome 12 able to paint the whole paint in 53.90 seconds, and painted 96 paintballs per minutes, Google Chrome 12 couldn’t handle Paintball benchmark quite well and took long time and slows down the machine. Give it a try in your browser Here.

5. Memory Usage

Opening same number of tabs “10 tabs” in both web browser the memory usage was 125 MB for Firefox 5 and 320 MB for Google chrome 12.
These Benchmarks effected by your computer hardware specifications CPU, RAM, GPU,..etc

Benchmark Conclusion

Google Chrome 12 performs really well with many JavaScript functions according to benchmarks used in this post. HTML 5 video benchmark and CSS 3D hardware acceleration works incredibly well. Google chrome uses a separated memory usage for each tab and google extensions but overall after comparing it with firefox it require more memory with running same number to tabs.
Mozilla Firefox 5 benchmark scores looks really low compared to firefox scores even though it was performing quite good with same benchmark tools specially for compiling JavaScript with taking advantage of your CPU and RAM. Firefox 5 does not require a lot of memory usage.



Firefox 5.0 Update Arrives in Official Ubuntu Repositories

Powertop 2.0 – saving power under Linux











Fuduntu 14.10 - Now Available




Posted by at
Labels: , ,

7 comments:

  1. AnonymousJune 30, 2011 at 11:41 PM

    Chrome is certainly better

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 3, 2013 at 7:25 AM

    if Indian youngsters can discover so swiftly , imagine if education in India was aggressively?
    pursued. Dear God, the unrealized prospective is most
    likely sturdy sufficient to consider over the globe.


    Here is my site: 60 minute stamina Free watch

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJune 4, 2013 at 6:43 PM

    what does NSA Intercourse imply. I have seen it a number of instances and
    would just prefer to know what NSA intercourse implies.


    Here is my web site :: marcus London

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJune 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM

    For those who want to know far more about the health
    effects of intermittent fasting (I did a 24/24-hour cycle for any year),
    I've very several posts on the subject on my weblog:

    Have a look at my weblog - precision nutrition lean eating habits

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJune 7, 2013 at 11:43 AM

    This website was... how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something which helped me.

    Appreciate it!

    Take a look at my homepage ... basyx Vl210mm10

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJune 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM

    I am not sure about a subsitute for curry, it is a pretty unique flavor but I will look into it.
    Turnips will be wonderful. Or a lot more beets in the event you liek beets.
    Russet potatoes will operate, but they do not hold up
    as well as sweet potatoes.

    Here is my weblog :: metabolic cooking 2.0

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousApril 15, 2014 at 5:52 AM

    I like the helpful info you provide in your articles.

    I will bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently.
    I'm quite certain I will learn many new stuff right here!
    Best of luck for the next!

    Also visit my web page: Amazon

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)