We've been hearing about Seagate's plans to offer an unencumbered 3TB hard drive since May of last year, but despite promises of a 2010 launch and the release of similarly large HDDs from companies like Western Digital and Hitachi, we're only now seeing the 3TB Barracuda XT shipping all on its own. We won't claim to have an explanation for the delay, but it's possible that the company's proprietary software -- which breaks the 2.1TB legacy OS barrier and enables this guy to function within Windows XP -- could have something to do with it. It might be tardy to the party, but the new Barracuda can definitely hold its own when stacked against the competition -- it spins at 7,200RPM, touts a 64MB cache, and plays nice with the 6Gbps SATA interface. It ain't the only 3TB fish in the sea, but at $280, it's definitely not dead in the water.
Labels
acer
airtel
amazon
amd
android
apple
archos
asus
ATnT
atrix
blackberry
bosch
camera
chrome 11
chrome os
chromebook
chromium
cloud computing
computex 2011
dell
discussion
facebook
fedora 15
firefox 5
flyer
galaxy
gaming
google
hp
IE 9
intel
ios
ios 5
ipad
iphone
iphone 4
ipod
laptops
lenovo
LG
LibreOffice
Linux
microsoft
motorola
natty narwal
new tech
nexus s
ngp
nintendo
nokia
nvidia
optimus
optimus 2X
phone
playbook
playstation
qriocity
samsung
sandy bridge
Skype
sony
sony ericsson
sprint
T-moblie
tablet
thinkpad
Ubuntu
ubuntu 11.04
ubuntu studio 11.04
vodafone
windows 7
windows 8
windows phone 7
xoom
Monday, March 7, 2011
Seagate ships 7,200RPM 3TB Barracuda XT internal hard drive, we wonder what took so long
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
$280? I can buy 4 2TB drives for that price. Lemme see, 8TB for $280 vs 3TB for $280. Maybe they intend to sell these to walmart shoppers.
ReplyDeletePremium capacity drives always start out at a premium price. Its been that way for at least 15 years, an all likely since the beginning of mass produced mechanical drives. I simply cannot fathom how an Engadget reader could express indignation that this. Its like complaining about the sun setting.
ReplyDelete